Moss-covered volcanic rocks in Iceland
WE KNOW A PLACE.AND IT’S NOT ICELAND.

NORSECODE / PRODUCTION SERVICE / NORWAY

COST OF LIVING

LOWER EVERYDAY COSTS.
MORE ROOM FOR YOUR PRODUCTION.

Everyday expenses add up when a production brings international cast and crew on location. Lower food and living costs can leave more of the budget available for what appears on screen—especially with larger teams and longer stays.

Numbeo’s Reykjavík–Oslo comparison places Oslo’s overall living costs 7.5% lower excluding rent, and 9.7% lower including rent. These are city-level consumer estimates, rather than a comparison of complete film budgets.

REYKJAVÍK = 100 / OSLO RELATIVE COST

THE EVERYDAY COST DIFFERENCE

Cost categoryReykjavíkOsloOslo vs ReykjavíkProduction relevance
Living costs, excluding rent10092.57.5% lowerDay-to-day costs for a visiting team
Living costs, including rent10090.39.7% lowerContext for an extended stay
Restaurants10083.616.4% lowerMeals purchased locally; catering requires a separate quote
Groceries10088.811.2% lowerFood supplies and self-catering
Residential rent10085.015.0% lowerLonger-term housing; not a hotel-price comparison

SELECTED ITEMS / REYKJAVÍK VS OSLO

WHAT EVERYDAY EXPENSES LOOK LIKE

Selected examples from the supplied Numbeo screenshots, captured on 24 October 2026. Both cities are shown in NOK using the conversions displayed in that snapshot. These selected items show lower Oslo prices; they are not the complete consumer basket.

Meals & refreshments

Daily spending for visiting cast and crew.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Inexpensive restaurant meal290.94200.0031.3% lower
Fast-food combo meal252.66150.0040.6% lower
Domestic draft beer, 0.5 litre130.16110.0015.5% lower
Regular cappuccino63.1755.9311.5% lower

Groceries

Selected food purchases from the supplied comparison; commercial catering is quoted separately.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Mid-range bottle of wine222.04157.5029.1% lower
Eggs, 12 large66.3256.7214.5% lower
Local cheese, 1 kg204.69141.7730.7% lower
Chicken fillets, 1 kg227.25148.0734.8% lower
Beef round or equivalent, 1 kg391.31298.7823.6% lower
Tomatoes, 1 kg60.5656.077.4% lower
Potatoes, 1 kg36.6725.7829.7% lower

Local transport

Public transport and standard taxi indicators; production vehicles and unit transport need supplier quotes. Taxi starting charges are separate.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
One-way public transport ticket52.8346.0012.9% lower
Monthly public transport pass888.14778.0012.4% lower
Taxi, per kilometre26.4117.5033.7% lower
Taxi waiting, one hour751.09666.0011.3% lower

Monthly residential rent

Useful context for longer stays. These are residential market estimates, not hotel or short-term serviced-apartment offers.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
One-bedroom apartment, city centre23,635.3019,317.6518.3% lower
One-bedroom apartment, outside centre19,038.9114,889.7721.8% lower
Three-bedroom apartment, city centre32,380.1828,839.1710.9% lower
Three-bedroom apartment, outside centre25,495.8022,393.6312.2% lower

Broadband

A household cost indicator, rather than a production connectivity quotation.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Unlimited broadband, 60 Mbps or above, monthly805.73510.8936.6% lower

Clothing & shoes

Selected consumer purchases that may inform personal spending or retail wardrobe purchases.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Jeans, Levi’s 501 or similar1,396.02959.0031.3% lower
Mid-range Nike running shoes1,703.551,269.9025.5% lower
Men’s leather business shoes2,330.951,495.0035.9% lower

Leisure during longer stays

Personal living expenses for an extended stay, rather than core production costs.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Monthly fitness club membership920.16533.6142.0% lower
Tennis court, one weekend hour476.40275.0042.3% lower

Family costs during extended stays

Relevant where cast or crew relocate with family. Eligibility, places and actual fees must be checked individually.

ItemReykjavík · NOKOslo · NOKOslo vs Reykjavík
Private full-day preschool, monthly per child11,103.652,255.0079.7% lower
International primary school, annual per child242,205.24148,455.5638.7% lower

Financing context

The supplied snapshot also reports a 20-year fixed mortgage interest rate of 8.81% in Reykjavík and 4.94% in Oslo: 3.87 percentage points lower, or 43.9% lower in relative terms. This describes residential borrowing and must not be used as a film-financing rate or a direct production saving.

01 / INTERNATIONAL CAST & CREW

The cost of bringing
your team on location.

Bringing the same international crew to Iceland can mean higher everyday spending than basing that crew in Norway. The clearest signals in the capital-city comparison are restaurant meals, groceries and residential rent. Over many people and many shooting days, even modest differences can become meaningful.

This advantage concerns local living expenses. International crew fees, flights, visas, work permissions, hotels and negotiated production rates need their own estimates. Oslo and Reykjavík are reference points; prices around the actual filming locations may differ.

An illustrative food-budget example

If restaurant meals for a team cost €30,000 in Reykjavík, applying the displayed 16.4% difference gives €25,080 in Oslo—a potential difference of €4,920. This is an illustration using a consumer-price indicator, not a catering quotation or a guaranteed production saving.

For the reverse comparison, Reykjavík’s restaurant-price level is approximately 19.6% higher than Oslo’s. The percentage changes because the starting budget is different.

02 / LOCAL CREW

Living costs influence
the local cost base.

Iceland’s higher living costs are a factor that can contribute to higher local crew costs. Professionals need earnings that cover housing, food and everyday expenses, creating upward pressure on rates and the cost of supplying services.

The Numbeo comparison supports the living-cost difference; it does not measure film-crew rates or prove that every Icelandic role costs more. A meaningful crew comparison uses matching roles, experience, working hours, overtime, employer contributions and employment terms. No crew-rate percentage is inferred from the living-cost figures.

03 / THE COMPLETE PRODUCTION BUDGET

Compare the whole shoot.
Keep the daily advantage.

Everyday prices are one part of the decision. Compare local crew quotations, hotel room blocks, equipment packages, freight, vehicles, travel days and location access alongside any applicable incentives and tax treatment.

Not every item favours Norway: Numbeo’s snapshot puts petrol and household utilities higher in Oslo. Residential utility bills are not a measure of production power costs. Each budget line needs the relevant supplier quote.

Norway’s lower everyday costs can create a practical budget advantage for international productions, particularly when cast and crew stay for longer periods. Combine that advantage with a production-specific budget to understand the final saving.

LET’S BUILD YOUR NORWAY BUDGET ↗

DATE & SOURCE

Source: Numbeo — Reykjavík vs Oslo, checked 24 October 2026. The page reports updates on 20 October for Reykjavík and 22 October for Oslo. Detailed item prices are transcribed from the supplied screenshots captured on 24 October 2026, including their displayed NOK conversions. The duplicate taxi-waiting row has been counted once. “Lower” percentages use Reykjavík as the baseline. Numbeo uses contributor-reported prices; figures and exchange rates change. Relative indices above are calculated from the displayed percentage differences. Categories overlap and must not be added together.