NORSECODE / PRODUCTION SERVICE / NORWAY
COST OF LIVING
LOWER EVERYDAY COSTS.
MORE ROOM FOR YOUR PRODUCTION.
Everyday expenses add up when a production brings international cast and crew on location. Lower food and living costs can leave more of the budget available for what appears on screen—especially with larger teams and longer stays.
Numbeo’s Reykjavík–Oslo comparison places Oslo’s overall living costs 7.5% lower excluding rent, and 9.7% lower including rent. These are city-level consumer estimates, rather than a comparison of complete film budgets.
REYKJAVÍK = 100 / OSLO RELATIVE COST
THE EVERYDAY COST DIFFERENCE
| Cost category | Reykjavík | Oslo | Oslo vs Reykjavík | Production relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Living costs, excluding rent | 100 | 92.5 | 7.5% lower | Day-to-day costs for a visiting team |
| Living costs, including rent | 100 | 90.3 | 9.7% lower | Context for an extended stay |
| Restaurants | 100 | 83.6 | 16.4% lower | Meals purchased locally; catering requires a separate quote |
| Groceries | 100 | 88.8 | 11.2% lower | Food supplies and self-catering |
| Residential rent | 100 | 85.0 | 15.0% lower | Longer-term housing; not a hotel-price comparison |
SELECTED ITEMS / REYKJAVÍK VS OSLO
WHAT EVERYDAY EXPENSES LOOK LIKE
Selected examples from the supplied Numbeo screenshots, captured on 24 October 2026. Both cities are shown in NOK using the conversions displayed in that snapshot. These selected items show lower Oslo prices; they are not the complete consumer basket.
Meals & refreshments
Daily spending for visiting cast and crew.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inexpensive restaurant meal | 290.94 | 200.00 | 31.3% lower |
| Fast-food combo meal | 252.66 | 150.00 | 40.6% lower |
| Domestic draft beer, 0.5 litre | 130.16 | 110.00 | 15.5% lower |
| Regular cappuccino | 63.17 | 55.93 | 11.5% lower |
Groceries
Selected food purchases from the supplied comparison; commercial catering is quoted separately.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-range bottle of wine | 222.04 | 157.50 | 29.1% lower |
| Eggs, 12 large | 66.32 | 56.72 | 14.5% lower |
| Local cheese, 1 kg | 204.69 | 141.77 | 30.7% lower |
| Chicken fillets, 1 kg | 227.25 | 148.07 | 34.8% lower |
| Beef round or equivalent, 1 kg | 391.31 | 298.78 | 23.6% lower |
| Tomatoes, 1 kg | 60.56 | 56.07 | 7.4% lower |
| Potatoes, 1 kg | 36.67 | 25.78 | 29.7% lower |
Local transport
Public transport and standard taxi indicators; production vehicles and unit transport need supplier quotes. Taxi starting charges are separate.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-way public transport ticket | 52.83 | 46.00 | 12.9% lower |
| Monthly public transport pass | 888.14 | 778.00 | 12.4% lower |
| Taxi, per kilometre | 26.41 | 17.50 | 33.7% lower |
| Taxi waiting, one hour | 751.09 | 666.00 | 11.3% lower |
Monthly residential rent
Useful context for longer stays. These are residential market estimates, not hotel or short-term serviced-apartment offers.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-bedroom apartment, city centre | 23,635.30 | 19,317.65 | 18.3% lower |
| One-bedroom apartment, outside centre | 19,038.91 | 14,889.77 | 21.8% lower |
| Three-bedroom apartment, city centre | 32,380.18 | 28,839.17 | 10.9% lower |
| Three-bedroom apartment, outside centre | 25,495.80 | 22,393.63 | 12.2% lower |
Broadband
A household cost indicator, rather than a production connectivity quotation.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlimited broadband, 60 Mbps or above, monthly | 805.73 | 510.89 | 36.6% lower |
Clothing & shoes
Selected consumer purchases that may inform personal spending or retail wardrobe purchases.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeans, Levi’s 501 or similar | 1,396.02 | 959.00 | 31.3% lower |
| Mid-range Nike running shoes | 1,703.55 | 1,269.90 | 25.5% lower |
| Men’s leather business shoes | 2,330.95 | 1,495.00 | 35.9% lower |
Leisure during longer stays
Personal living expenses for an extended stay, rather than core production costs.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly fitness club membership | 920.16 | 533.61 | 42.0% lower |
| Tennis court, one weekend hour | 476.40 | 275.00 | 42.3% lower |
Family costs during extended stays
Relevant where cast or crew relocate with family. Eligibility, places and actual fees must be checked individually.
| Item | Reykjavík · NOK | Oslo · NOK | Oslo vs Reykjavík |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private full-day preschool, monthly per child | 11,103.65 | 2,255.00 | 79.7% lower |
| International primary school, annual per child | 242,205.24 | 148,455.56 | 38.7% lower |
Financing context
The supplied snapshot also reports a 20-year fixed mortgage interest rate of 8.81% in Reykjavík and 4.94% in Oslo: 3.87 percentage points lower, or 43.9% lower in relative terms. This describes residential borrowing and must not be used as a film-financing rate or a direct production saving.
01 / INTERNATIONAL CAST & CREW
The cost of bringing
your team on location.
Bringing the same international crew to Iceland can mean higher everyday spending than basing that crew in Norway. The clearest signals in the capital-city comparison are restaurant meals, groceries and residential rent. Over many people and many shooting days, even modest differences can become meaningful.
This advantage concerns local living expenses. International crew fees, flights, visas, work permissions, hotels and negotiated production rates need their own estimates. Oslo and Reykjavík are reference points; prices around the actual filming locations may differ.
An illustrative food-budget example
If restaurant meals for a team cost €30,000 in Reykjavík, applying the displayed 16.4% difference gives €25,080 in Oslo—a potential difference of €4,920. This is an illustration using a consumer-price indicator, not a catering quotation or a guaranteed production saving.
For the reverse comparison, Reykjavík’s restaurant-price level is approximately 19.6% higher than Oslo’s. The percentage changes because the starting budget is different.
02 / LOCAL CREW
Living costs influence
the local cost base.
Iceland’s higher living costs are a factor that can contribute to higher local crew costs. Professionals need earnings that cover housing, food and everyday expenses, creating upward pressure on rates and the cost of supplying services.
The Numbeo comparison supports the living-cost difference; it does not measure film-crew rates or prove that every Icelandic role costs more. A meaningful crew comparison uses matching roles, experience, working hours, overtime, employer contributions and employment terms. No crew-rate percentage is inferred from the living-cost figures.
03 / THE COMPLETE PRODUCTION BUDGET
Compare the whole shoot.
Keep the daily advantage.
Everyday prices are one part of the decision. Compare local crew quotations, hotel room blocks, equipment packages, freight, vehicles, travel days and location access alongside any applicable incentives and tax treatment.
Not every item favours Norway: Numbeo’s snapshot puts petrol and household utilities higher in Oslo. Residential utility bills are not a measure of production power costs. Each budget line needs the relevant supplier quote.
Norway’s lower everyday costs can create a practical budget advantage for international productions, particularly when cast and crew stay for longer periods. Combine that advantage with a production-specific budget to understand the final saving.
LET’S BUILD YOUR NORWAY BUDGET ↗DATE & SOURCE
Source: Numbeo — Reykjavík vs Oslo, checked 24 October 2026. The page reports updates on 20 October for Reykjavík and 22 October for Oslo. Detailed item prices are transcribed from the supplied screenshots captured on 24 October 2026, including their displayed NOK conversions. The duplicate taxi-waiting row has been counted once. “Lower” percentages use Reykjavík as the baseline. Numbeo uses contributor-reported prices; figures and exchange rates change. Relative indices above are calculated from the displayed percentage differences. Categories overlap and must not be added together.